Parents Protest Schools Irradiated Meat Plan
Thu Dec 12,12:34 PM ET
By Randy Fabi
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration's plan to allow irradiated
meat to be served to millions of U.S. school children is being criticized
by some concerned parents.
Irradiation, which has been endorsed by the World Health Organization
(news - web sites), exposes food to low doses of electrons or gamma
rays to destroy deadly microorganisms such as E. coli O157:H7 and
salmonella.
Under the U.S. farm subsidy law enacted in May, the U.S. Agriculture
Department must allow government-approved food safety technology
such as irradiation to be used in commodities purchased by the federal
school lunch program. Some 27 million schoolchildren receive free
or low-cost meals daily in the program.
The USDA currently prohibits the irradiated meat in its vast school
lunch program, which spends billions of dollars annually to buy
meat, vegetables, fruits and other foods.
Last month, the USDA asked for public input on implementing a
program for irradiated beef and so far has received more than 200
responses. Most were from disgruntled parents opposing irradiated
meat. "As a parent, I will stop allowing my children to eat
school cafeteria food if irradiated food is allowed to be served,"
said Steve Steinhoff of Madison, Wisconsin. Wilfred Small from New
York City said that "years from now we shall look back with
regret on the day we started feeding irradiated food to our children."
Other parents urged the USDA to conduct more research on the new
technology before distributing it to children. Some said the use
of irradiation will give meat companies an excuse to relax
their food safety programs, leaving animal feces or other contaminants
in meat. "Do not use irradiated food in school cafeterias,"
said Tina Manassaram of Orlando, Florida. "Innocent children
will pay the price for the meat industry's laziness."
ENVIRO GROUP BEHIND STRONG OPPOSITION
Meat industry officials dismissed the letters, saying they were
organized by Washington-based Public Citizen. The letters do not
represent the overall public opinion of irradiated meat, they said.
"I don't think the average consumer ... is aware of the need
to write in support of it," said Janet Riley, spokeswoman for
the American Meat Institute. "The more consumers know about
irradiated meat, the more they are willing to accept it."
A nationwide survey conducted by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association
(news - web sites) found 48 percent of Americans likely to purchase
irradiated meat. The November survey was up from a 38 percent response
in February.
Industry groups want the USDA to implement a pilot program to gradually
introduce irradiated meat to school cafeterias.
If the USDA ultimately decides to allow irradiated meat, many parents
said the meat should be segregated and labeled.
"Consumers have a right to know if their food is being irradiated,"
said Debbie Ortman of Hermantown, Minnesota. "How am I going
to be able to tell what foods to tell my children to eat or not
to eat when in school?"
Currently, irradiated foods must be labeled and bear a special symbol
informing consumers.
The American School Food Service Association, which supports the
new technology, said it will ask the USDA to segregate irradiated
meat so parents can decide whether their child should eat it.
"We don't anticipate that anyone or any school district is
going to be required to eat irradiated meat," said Barry Sackin,
the group's vice president.
The USDA will accept comments on meat irradiation until Dec. 22.
Alisa Harrison, USDA spokeswoman, said the department intends to
propose changes that would allow the technology by the end of the
year.
|